Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

L6-09 · Quantum counterfactual questions

State the additional structure needed for a counterfactual.

Level 6 icon Level 6 · Graduate
Objective. State the additional structure needed for a counterfactual.
Before this lesson. L6-04, L4-09
Hands-on lab. Qubits and the Bloch sphere

Learn

A classical counterfactual asks what would have occurred under another action for the same relevant background. It requires a structural model that connects observed and alternative worlds. Observational probabilities alone do not generally determine that connection, even before quantum systems are introduced.

Quantum alternatives can involve incompatible measurements and different disturbances. There is no universal joint classical record of all unperformed outcomes. A proposed quantum counterfactual must specify its semantics, available operations, conditioning event, and physical model. Several research approaches make different commitments.

Do not assign simultaneous definite values to all incompatible measurements without an explicit additional model. For an operational question, often an intervention probability is sufficient and better defined. Clearly distinguish a repeatable experimental prediction from a claim about an unperformed event in a particular past trial.

Practice

Solution

A fresh Z measurement gives 0 with probability one under the preparation model. This predicts a different procedure. It does not supply a joint observed record of incompatible X and Z outcomes in the original trial.

Check your understanding

What must accompany a quantum counterfactual claim?

Show the answer

C. Explicit semantics and a physical model

Counterfactual claims connect factual and alternative procedures. That connection needs a stated model and semantics beyond one observed frequency table.

Sources

This lesson draws on Leifer & Spekkens, 2013Allen et al., 2017.

Next: L6-10 · Design a quantum causal experiment

References
  1. Leifer, M. S., & Spekkens, R. W. (2013). Towards a Formulation of Quantum Theory as a Causally Neutral Theory of Bayesian Inference. Physical Review A, 88(5). 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052130
  2. Allen, J.-M. A., Barrett, J., Horsman, D. C., Lee, C. M., & Spekkens, R. W. (2017). Quantum common causes and quantum causal models. Physical Review X, 7(3). 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031021