Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

L7-05 · Identifiability before quantum causal learning

Prove a target is identifiable before fitting a flexible model.

Level 7 icon Level 7 · Doctoral & postdoctoral
Objective. Prove a target is identifiable before fitting a flexible model.
Before this lesson. L6-05, L7-01
Hands-on lab. Confounding and intervention

Learn

A flexible learner can match observed probabilities while representing the wrong intervention behavior. This is a fundamental identification problem rather than an optimizer defect. Define the observational or operational equivalence class before choosing a model architecture. The target must be constant across that class to be identifiable.

For quantum processes, restricted instruments can make distinct channels or graphs indistinguishable. Hidden environments can enlarge the equivalence class. An expressive quantum or classical learner cannot create information absent from the data. A prior can choose an answer but must be disclosed as an additional assumption.

Use a constructive test. Find two allowed models with identical accessible predictions but different target values. Such a pair disproves identification for that design. To repair the study, add an informative intervention, narrow the justified model class, or report bounds instead of a point claim.

Practice

Solution

It is prior-selected rather than identified by those records. Prepare |+> and measure X after the device. Identity predicts + with probability one, while complete Z dephasing predicts one half.

Check your understanding

What disproves target identification?

Show the answer

B. Two data-equivalent models with different target values

If two permitted models give identical available data but different targets, that data cannot select one target value without an additional assumption.

Sources

This lesson draws on Costa & Shrapnel, 2016Barrett et al., 2019Allen et al., 2017.

Next: L7-06 · Sample complexity and resource accounting

References
  1. Costa, F., & Shrapnel, S. (2016). Quantum causal modelling. New Journal of Physics, 18(6), 063032. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/063032
  2. Barrett, J., Lorenz, R., & Oreshkov, O. (2019). Quantum Causal Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.10726
  3. Allen, J.-M. A., Barrett, J., Horsman, D. C., Lee, C. M., & Spekkens, R. W. (2017). Quantum common causes and quantum causal models. Physical Review X, 7(3). 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031021