Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

L7-06 · Sample complexity and resource accounting

Separate copies, queries, gates, and total experimental cost.

Level 7 icon Level 7 · Doctoral & postdoctoral
Objective. Separate copies, queries, gates, and total experimental cost.
Before this lesson. L7-04, L7-05
Hands-on lab. Chance and repeated trials

Learn

Sample complexity counts the observations needed for a stated accuracy and failure probability. Query complexity counts accesses to an oracle or process. Gate complexity counts circuit operations. Wall-clock cost also includes state preparation, reset, compilation, communication, and analysis. These quantities cannot be substituted without an access model.

For a bounded measurement mean, independent samples give a simple concentration bound. The bound can be conservative but it states a reproducible requirement. Correlated drift or adaptive stopping can invalidate an independence-based analysis. Declare those conditions before interpreting the calculated count.

A quantum advantage can concern one resource while increasing another. State whether the comparison counts classical samples, coherent queries, quantum memory, or compute time. A theoretical oracle model can be useful, but its assumptions must be visible beside any practical claim.

Practice

Solution

The bound gives N >= 50 ln(20), approximately 149.79. Use 150 independent shots. This does not count gate operations, state-preparation time, or the extra cost of estimating several observables.

Check your understanding

Which statement is correct about resource counts?

Show the answer

C. Each count needs its own stated access and cost model

Different resource measures describe different operations. An algorithm can save queries while spending more preparation or computation time, so the comparison must state its model.

Sources

This lesson draws on Liu et al., 2025Watrous, 2018Huang et al., 2021.

Next: L7-07 · Classical shadows and observable structure

References
  1. Liu, X., Qiu, Y., Dahlsten, O., & Vedral, V. (2025). Quantum Causal Inference with Extremely Light Touch. Npj Quantum Information, 11(1). 10.1038/s41534-024-00956-0
  2. Watrous, J. (2018). The Theory of Quantum Information. https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~watrous/TQI/
  3. Huang, H.-Y., Broughton, M., Mohseni, M., Babbush, R., Boixo, S., Neven, H., & McClean, J. R. (2021). Power of data in quantum machine learning. Nature Communications, 12(1). 10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9